Personlige verktøy

Council on Foreign Relations

Fra Xiandos Info

Gå til: navigasjon, søk

Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) er den primære politiske organisasjonen i USA.

Innhold

[rediger] Det har blitt sagt at...

The Council on Foreign Relations ble beskrevet av tidligere senator og presidentkandidat Barry Goldwater som:

"Et avspring av en hemmelig britisk organisasjon hvis formål er å ødelegge USA sin selvstendighet og opprette en Verdensregjering.

I 2004 beskrev George Humphrey CFR som "Elitens primære politiske organisasjon i USA.".

"The Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) is the American Branch of a society which originated in England ... (and) ... believes national boundaries should be obliterated and one-world rule established."-- Professor of History Carroll Quigley, Georgetown University, i hans bok "Tragedy and Hope".

[rediger] Den offisielle historien

The Council on Foreign Relations describes itself as a think tank "dedicated to increasing America's understanding of the world and contributing ideas to U.S. foreign policy. The Council accomplishes this mainly by promoting constructive, closed debates and discussions, clarifying world issues, and publishing Foreign Affairs."

[rediger] Kort oppsummert

Round table.jpg
  • Council on Foreign Relations ble grunnlagt i 1921.

[rediger] Board of Directors

[rediger] Executive

[rediger] Officers

(from [1] accessed August 05)

[rediger] Current Directors

(from [2] accessed August 05)

[rediger] Officers and Directors Emeriti


[rediger] Other well-known members

[rediger] 2005

[rediger] May

[rediger] May 24, 2005

May 24, 2005. New York, N.Y.

  • Craig Whitney gave some interesting statements:
    • "The main reason that the Bush administration gave for going to war against Iraq, as we should remember, was that Iraq had weapons of mass destruction [WMD] and links with the terrorists or the kind of terrorists who had carried out the 9/11 attacks against the United States. But we now know that Saddam Hussein had no weapons of mass destruction to speak of in 2003, when we went to war."
    • "Does it matter to Americans that our country went to war on a false premise?"
    • "People in a democracy I think, need to know why their elected leaders make mistakes when they make them, and voters need to be able to draw their own conclusions about what went wrong when things go wrong. And that’s why Public Affairs commissioned this book, The WMD Mirage, which collects basic documents from the United States and from the United Nations with the idea of offering readers, voters, a factual starting point at least to help build an understanding of what went wrong and what’s been done to try to right the wrong, because WMD has not gone away as an issue in America’s and the world’s attempts to deal with two other important countries: Iran and North Korea."
  • Charles Duelfer:
    • "Secondly, and we describe this in some detail in the report, there was a greater concern than we could appreciate sitting here in Washington of the threat posed by Iran. And we just, you know, that our gut feeling for that was not the same as the gut feeling one would have sitting in Baghdad, where you had invaded and killed a lot of those people, and then every once in a while they were throwing rockets at you, so there was an ongoing conflict there. And Saddam was certainly aware of the WMD assessments of Iran and he created intentionally a certain ambiguity about what his capabilities were. So there were mixed motivations."

[rediger] November

  • 2005-11-15: U.S. Foreign Policy and the Middle East Rush Transcript; Federal News Service, Inc.
    • Speaker: Chuck Hagel
    • "Violent Islamic extremism finds refuge in Iraq, Iran and Syria and seeks to make inroads elsewhere in the region. The proliferation of weapons of mass destruction remains a threat. Political and economic reform is limited and incomplete. And the United States has nearly 160,000 soldiers in Iraq in support of Iraq's uncertain future."

[rediger] The CFR are VIP

You should realize that the CFR are VIP (Very Important Person).

It is important to be aware of this regardless of your opinion on them being puppets mastered by puppets or not.

  • Following the information they release is better than reading astronomy.
  • Some guy who writes astronomy can't make up reasons to invade some country and later justify the lie by more lies.
  • Knowing what the CFR are up to can, when done using careful objective analysis and consideration, be like reading the exact future.

[rediger] Se også

[rediger] Eliten

Eliten - som definert av de som er medlemmer av:

Hentet fra «http://nb.xiandos.info/w/index.php?title=Council_on_Foreign_Relations&oldid=16126»